President Obama’s top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren advocates forced abortions and sterilizations as a means of population control

It doesn't seem like Obama is very concerned about appointing very controversial persons to his cabinet. It is almost as if he is testing to see how much he can get away with because there is no way that Holdren's past could have passed under the radar. On the contrary. It is more likely that he was appointed because of his ideas on population reduction.

He proves to us that he is a true eugenicist in "Ecoscience: Population, Resources and Environment" which he wrote 1977 and has never distanced himself from. In fact, the book appears behind him in this photo.

Some of his suggestions for reducing the world's population:

- Forcibly and unknowingly sterilizing the entire population by adding infertility drugs to the nation’s water and food supply.

- Legalizing “compulsory abortions,” ie forced abortions carried out against the will of the pregnant women, as is common place in Communist China where women who have already had one child and refuse to abort the second are kidnapped off the street by the authorities before a procedure is carried out to forcibly abort the baby.

- Babies who are born out of wedlock or to teenage mothers to be forcibly taken away from their mother by the government and put up for adoption. Another proposed measure would force single mothers to demonstrate to the government that they can care for the child, effectively introducing licensing to have children.

- Implementing a system of “involuntary birth control,” where both men and women would be mandated to have an infertility device implanted into their body at puberty and only have it removed temporarily if they received permission from the government to have a baby.

- Permanently sterilizing people who the authorities deem have already had too many children or who have contributed to “general social deterioration”.

- Formally passing a law that criminalizes having more than two children, similar to the one child policy in Communist China.

- This would all be overseen by a transnational and centralized “planetary regime” that would utilize a “global police force” to enforce the measures outlined above. The “planetary regime” would also have the power to determine population levels for every country in the world. (Prisonplanet)

This is a quote from page 942-3:

Toward a Planetary Regime

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

If you were president, would this guy be your choice for top science adviser?!?! It is clear that he is not working in the interest of the people he officially was elected to serve, i.e. the American population. Instead he is working in the interest of the guys behind the scene, appointing mad men to his cabinet who dream of a world where a world regime controls every aspect of our lives, down to who gets the right to reproduce.

What he wrote should definitely not be taken lightly. Perhaps the reason why Hitler did so well was because people didn't really care to actually read what he wrote in "Mein kampf" or take it seriously.