If a man decides to murder his wife in order to receive money from her life insurance but pays someone off to kill her for him instead of doing it himself, is the husband or the hitman he paid to have her killed guilty of murder?
There is no doubt in my mind that the husband would be considered guilty.
Compare this situation to one in which a policeman pays some guys off to commit a crime or to act as scapegoats in order for the police to look like they are doing a good job. Could the police be considered guilty of a crime? The criminals would be as unlikely to have committed the crime without the aid of the police as the hitman would be to kill the wife without having received money to do so from the husband.
Yesterday I wrote about the MI5 blackmailing young Muslim men to become informants. I also mentioned the probability that the New York terror plot had been orchestrated by the FBI and that the "terrorists" were actually patsies. Well, according to this article, the girlfriend of one of these men makes the claim that they had been lured by money and drugs and that they had no plans of carrying out a terrorist attack.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05242009/news/regionalnews/jihad_bait__snitch_170769.htm?page=0
If "terrorists" need to be found using baits or threats one may question if one should be more concerned about the terrorists or those who have created them. If there were no FBI informants or MI5 agents running after Muslims with money or threats, would we have had any problems with domestic terrorism?
There is no doubt in my mind that the husband would be considered guilty.
Compare this situation to one in which a policeman pays some guys off to commit a crime or to act as scapegoats in order for the police to look like they are doing a good job. Could the police be considered guilty of a crime? The criminals would be as unlikely to have committed the crime without the aid of the police as the hitman would be to kill the wife without having received money to do so from the husband.
Yesterday I wrote about the MI5 blackmailing young Muslim men to become informants. I also mentioned the probability that the New York terror plot had been orchestrated by the FBI and that the "terrorists" were actually patsies. Well, according to this article, the girlfriend of one of these men makes the claim that they had been lured by money and drugs and that they had no plans of carrying out a terrorist attack.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05242009/news/regionalnews/jihad_bait__snitch_170769.htm?page=0
If "terrorists" need to be found using baits or threats one may question if one should be more concerned about the terrorists or those who have created them. If there were no FBI informants or MI5 agents running after Muslims with money or threats, would we have had any problems with domestic terrorism?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment